Internet-Draft SDF Protocol Mapping for CoAP March 2026
Romann, et al. Expires 4 September 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
A Semantic Definition Format for Data and Interactions of Things
Internet-Draft:
draft-romann-asdf-coap-protocol-map-latest
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
J. Romann
Universität Bremen
R. Mohan
Cisco Systems
L. Corneo
Ericsson

Semantic Definition Format (SDF): Protocol Mapping for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)

Abstract

This memo defines vocabulary to integrate the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) into Protocol Mappings [I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping] for the Semantic Definition Format (SDF) for Data and Interactions of Things [RFC9880].

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-romann-asdf-coap-protocol-map/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the A Semantic Definition Format for Data and Interactions of Things Working Group mailing list (mailto:asdf@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/JKRhb/sdf-coap-protocol-map.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 September 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This memo defines vocabulary to integrate the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) [RFC7252] into Protocol Mappings [I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping] for the Semantic Definition Format (SDF) for Data and Interactions of Things [RFC9880].

The vocabulary and "feature-based" approach taken within this document is heavily inspired by the CoAP Protocol Binding [WoT-CoAP-Binding] for the W3C Web of Things (WoT), which is to be used with WoT Thing Descriptions (TDs). Considering SDF's role as a "hub format", we aspire to be able to also take into account CoAP vocabulary when converting from and to TDs.

An important additional aspect to the base protocol-mapping specification [I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping] is the fact that we rely on instance-related messages [I-D.ietf-asdf-instance-information] to complement protocol information present in SDF models. Compared to the WoT approach, we achieve a stricter separation of model and instance information this way, reducing the amount of information that needs to be supplied by a Thing itself to a minimum to enable interactions.

2. Conventions and Definitions

The definitions of [RFC9880], [I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping], and [I-D.ietf-asdf-instance-information] apply.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Security Considerations

The security considerations of [RFC9880] as well as [RFC7252] apply to this document as well.

4. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

5. References

5.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-asdf-instance-information]
Romann, J. and C. Bormann, "Instance Information for SDF", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-asdf-instance-information-02, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-asdf-instance-information-02>.
[I-D.ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping]
Mohan, R., Brinckman, B., and L. Corneo, "SDF Protocol Mapping", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping-06, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-protocol-mapping-06>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC7252]
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., and C. Bormann, "The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 7252, DOI 10.17487/RFC7252, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7252>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC9880]
Koster, M., Ed., Bormann, C., Ed., and A. Keränen, "Semantic Definition Format (SDF) for Data and Interactions of Things", RFC 9880, DOI 10.17487/RFC9880, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9880>.

5.2. Informative References

[WoT-CoAP-Binding]
Hartke, K. and J. Romann, "Web of Things (WoT) CoAP Binding", <https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/bindings/protocols/coap/index.html>.

Acknowledgments

TODO acknowledge.

Authors' Addresses

Jan Romann
Universität Bremen
Rohit Mohan
Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, 95134
United States of America
Lorenzo Corneo
Ericsson
Hirsalantie 11
FI-1296 Jorvas
Finland